• Why the Left’s Strategy is Irrelevant

    Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

    One of my biggest bugbears in recent years has been hearing this idea being banded around in socialist media; (I don’t want to say left because that can mean too many different things) that suggests that socialists are to blame for our lack of societal traction.

    To me, this is total nonsense. While you can argue, and I’d agree, that the Corbyn campaign didn’t do everything 100% perfectly strategy wise for example; the discourse amplifies tiny strategic errors as being the virtual sole cause of loss of support amongst the electorate. Societal political literacy and media influence get mostly overlooked with less importance placed upon them. People like Nigel Farage and Richard Tice get the opposite treatment. Some prominent British socialist journalists are quick to praise Nigel Farage in particular as a political strategic genius. I’m not saying he isn’t a shrewd operator and a great public speaker / showman. He is. But he, and most others like him generally find their popularity falls into their lap. All they have to do is avoid a mega blunder that would cut through to the mainstream and expose them for the anti-worker charlatans they are and always have been to a population that barely pays attention to politics at all. Apart from on polling day where about half of them can be bothered to actually turn up and express their anger at how much more shit the country has become since last time.

    And that’s in a country where we still have a modicum of common sense and we aren’t by and large a zombie wasteland like the United States. There, you don’t even have to avoid the mega blunder. You can be an out-and-proud fascist, rapist, fraudster and so on; and still win the popular vote. It’s almost as if the less strategy you have, the better. So, why do we allow Farage, or Tice, or any of the rest of them to get painted as strategic masterminds even by socialists like Aaron Bastani (who I generally like); and meanwhile someone like Jeremy Corbyn gets harsh criticism from the same journalists and outlets for tiny strategic errors that would never even make the news if Farage did them?

    We don’t like to blame the public. We don’t want to have to say that a large part of our electorate are blithering idiots (which often leads them to racism, bigotry and sometimes violence); but it’s true. Look at every man or woman on the street “vox pop” video that’s been released on youtube or broadcast on TV in the last few years. They almost seem to be getting stupider, more racist and more bigoted with every single video. Maybe they are. Take Bastani’s recent trip to Runcorn for example. The vast majority of the people he talked to were convinced that Britain is a poor country and we have to choose between either housing and supporting British born citizens, and treating “illegal migrants” (aka desperate asylum seekers who have been through a hell of a lot to even get here) to lavish lifestyles in hotels. And they also tend to think that the migrants don’t want to work, when they are literally being prevented from working. The government refuse to reverse a couple of decade old policy that stops refugees contributing to society because it allows them to more easily demonise the vulnerable people; which in turn benefits them politically. Although it will benefit Farage more obviously.

    Even the people he interviewed who weren’t entirely brain rotted didn’t have much of use to say. Out of the whole almost half an hour long video, only one person mentioned the Green Party (the only left of centre party in England), and he was basically the only person who made any cogent points at all. As far as the two women I think it was who said they were going to vote Labour in the parliamentary by-election; the best argument they came up with was that Labour just needed a bit more time to see if they could turn it around. Aaron mentioned this as notable in his summary of the video as well.

    We need to be honest about the fact that British people are very, very stupid and uninformed on average at this point. Yes, you can say that Farage and Reform are “strategic” in terms being best placed to manipulate fools into voting against their own interests. But they’re not strategic masterminds. They’re just benefitting from decades of societal decay. There’s nothing significantly wrong with the left’s strategy. It’s been more than good enough to win elections in 2017 and 2019. We’ve seen it in Canada and Australia in the last couple of weeks. I’m not saying those results were good for the left. They weren’t. But those countries show that the more educated a society is, the more likely it is that they will resist fascism. Canada and Australia have definitely fallen back in education standards and political knowledge as well, which is why the results were still bad for socialists and social democrats. The “Shit Lite” party (as The Juice Media would say) won in both of those cases. I think that’s a really good illustration though of what this is really about.

    Smart countries vote for socialists. Moderately intelligent countries vote for the neoliberals, and brain dead looney populations vote for obvious charlatans who offer nothing to them, and get propped up by the media, like Nigel Farage.

  • I’ll Never Forgive The Liberals

    A globe on fire, illustrating the mess the liberals (aka the neoliberal and fascist enablers) have done to humanity and our planet.
    Fascist enabling liberals are responsible.

    I saw some liberal responses to an Instagram video by Chris Packham; where they say basically “I voted for Labour because I thought they would turn it all around, but they turned out to be just as shit as the Tories”.

    This shit broke me. It’s the most angry I’ve felt for quite a while. I haven’t been that angry about Trump. I’ve just been like “ah yeah ok” every time I’ve been told about the latest executive action Trump has introduced. I’m just entirely apathetic about it. Obviously I’ve been feeling for those innocent people impacted by these fascist policies. But I knew everything they would do, and I just generally prepared myself mentally for the worst policies I could imagine. So nothing shocked or surprised me in the slightest.

    But when it comes to liberal voters and politicians; they really infuriate me. Obviously it’s the same all over the world; but considering I’m British, I’ll talk about the situation here specifically. The way Jeremy Corbyn and the left in general have been treated by so called Labour and the media is just nauseating. And then on top of that, the way we were ignored at every single point, when we were right at EVERY SINGLE POINT is unforgivable. This isn’t them saying “you were right about Jeremy Corbyn. You were right about Starmer. You were right to vote for Rebecca Long-Bailey.” This is “we fucked up by voting for Starmer” and nothing more. It’s like when they say nothing before October 7th is relevant when it comes to Palestine. They ignore history to justify the unjustifiable in their minds. They’ll never accept the left was right and they were wrong about anything (let alone everything).

    They would rather play dumb and pretend that Labour under Starmer was always a social democratic proposition; until it suddenly wasn’t. It wasn’t an extreme neoliberal government in waiting from the very beginning in 2020 (5 years ago!) It wasn’t a party that offered nothing to voters because they knew as long as they remained alive, and gave away practically nothing on future policy; that by election day that they’d be in number 10 and 11 Downing Street. We can talk about the Tories making it inevitable that Labour would take over, and the media who ignored the only party that had policies that made actual sense (or any serious policy at all), the Green Party.

    But at the end of the day, a special fuck you goes out to the liberal voters. The ignorant, insufferable morons who insisted that they knew better than us. They knew better about the economy. They knew better about the climate. They knew better about nature. They knew better about antisemitism. They knew better about protest. They knew better about politics and political strategy.

    Except they didn’t. And they still can’t accept that they don’t. They never will, regardless of what goes wrong.

    Fuck these people! I’m never listening to any of them again. Nor the liberal media, who are probably at fault more than any voters. I don’t know. There’s just something about liberal voters realising they fucked up but never taking any responsibility that particularly pisses me off.

    Either way, they all need to own everything that happens from here on in. It’s nothing to do with the left. Climate breakdown and collapse. It’s on them. Fascism and the removal of all of our rights in the meantime. It’s on them.

    If you’re reading this and you’re a neoliberalism enabler; it’s all on you. We’re always told that we need to go further to the right, even though capitalist ideology has failed time and time again. Ok, you win. The world is going fascist. You got what you wanted. Now let’s see you take responsibility for once. No one is going to believe you this time, when you inevitably try to blame the left for your utter failure; and the destruction of our only home.

    I’m not even sure how far fetched it is to imagine a TV newsreader in a destroyed and smouldering newsroom in the future blaming Jeremy Corbyn and the left for our destruction at the hands of the fascists. That’s how insane our world now is.

    Fediverse Reactions
  • How to fix the music industry

    A live music venue with a band playing.

    End capitalism.

    Ok thanks for reading. See you next time on my blog.

    Seriously though, I did wonder if this is really a post worth writing, since, along with most other problems in our world; capitalism is the obvious cause. In the end, I did decide I could offer enough specifics to make it worth doing, so here we go.

    The things I’m going to suggest could technically be done under capitalism. But we all know they won’t be. Just to be clear.

    Pay artists properly via streaming

    Clearly the current streaming model doesn’t work for anyone other than the executives of the platforms or the biggest artists in the world. Everyone else is struggling, and that’s not acceptable. From a climate change perspective, it is also disastrous because it incentivises bands to sell as much merch and physical albums (vinyl and CD, and sometimes even Cassette and more) as possible. It also incentivises longer tours (I don’t necessarily think that’s bad in of itself); but most importantly, higher priced tickets for those tours to make up for the lack of streaming income.

    Streaming isn’t great for the environment, but it’s at least not the worst thing out there. As long as it avoids AI, downloads (which support artists much more) return to being the primary way of listening to your favourite bands; and streaming focuses purely on discovery, then it can work. But firstly, Spotify and the others need to be unified and then nationalised to provide a great worldwide service to all (especially the artists who are getting shafted right now).

    Have radio stations (and streaming artist radio) play album songs, not just high charting singles

    In order for this to happen, you probably require the end of corporate giant radio networks and the return of local independent stations with DJs being able to make their own playlist choices. Or the nationalised big stations like those operated by BBC need to lead the way in playing music that risks drawing in a smaller audience than if it were to just play established artists and hit songs. I’m not an expert on this particular point, and I do think the BBC in particular are probably among the better examples, but there do seem to be specific shows for new music, rather than it being throughout the schedule. And this is obviously far more so on commercial stations.

    Governments support new artists properly and make the arts a big focus of their economies again

    This is something I’ve seen being talked about by First Aid Kit and others. They were talking about how the Swedish government back home really looked after and supported them and other up-and-coming artists. Whereas, when they performed in the UK or US, they were basically left to fend for themselves, were paid poorly and not given even the basics from many venues. There is seemingly this kind of do it yourself attitude in the individualist countries (US and UK), that forms part of the whole artist attitude. But it shouldn’t be this way. It shouldn’t be about who has the most grit and determination (or the biggest bank of Mum and Dad). It should be about talent. The arts have become the preserve of those who can afford to pursue whichever art form they choose. That’s entirely wrong.

    Make it affordable and make quality instruments only

    Music needs to be available to everyone. There needs to be support at every level. For example, to help school kids who want to start a band get ahold of good quality instruments that they can grow into. This idea of “beginner instruments” needs to go away, as cheap things need to disappear in all parts of our society. A cheap guitar that goes out of tune all the time isn’t a good beginner instrument. I don’t know why we have this idea that cheap means beginner. The way I see it, beginners need the extra help more than the established people do. It’s the same for photography, where beginner cameras are cheap and have less advanced features to help you take better pictures. It’s the same everywhere. Cheap isn’t good for beginners. Cheap isn’t good for anyone.

    Conclusion

    This isn’t an exhaustive list. I’m sure people who are actual music industry experts could come up with many more problems with record labels, agents, venues and many other things I don’t have a clue about. But if just these big ones were solved, it would make a massive difference already.

    Music is like everything else in capitalism. I’m constantly astounded that anything works at all in our world, with the way everything is structured. It’s this human determination to make the best of a bad situation that drags capitalism into a situation where it just about functions. But it would be so easy to make just a handful of key changes here and there, to every part of society, and the positive difference would be immediately felt by everyone. Capitalism puts the shackles on everything we do. Even just loosening them will feel like incredible amount of freedom compared to what we’ve become used to over particularly the last half a century.

    Fediverse Reactions
  • How I would fix Football and other team sports

    Recently, I guess because I know how fucked our politics, economics and climate system are, I’ve felt compelled to spend time watching a sport I used to love growing up instead.

    The game is great. It’s everything around it that’s broken,

    I’ve always liked Football (Soccer), but haven’t watched it much in the last decade or so. It’s the game itself I like. The passing, the tactics, the formations, the goals, the athleticism and skill. The reason I haven’t watched it is everything else that I see as being broken with it. Unsporting behaviour, violent conduct and cheating. The obscene money (in the men’s game so far). The ridiculous inequality of talent and lack of competition league wide in every country I know of.

    Now that I’ve gotten back into it, it’s been in a different way. I’m watching a lot of women’s football, and the only men’s football I’m watching (aside from a bit of initial curiosity around Spain and Italy) is Scottish (mainly Celtic because of Palestine and their general left wing appeal), German (St. Pauli for similar reasons), and Japanese (because Japan is pretty respectful even in football). Otherwise it’s all been women’s leagues. The SWPL (Celtic of course, but also most other matches I can watch); WSL and Women’s Chanpionship in England, Serie A, Liga F, WE League. Anything I can find (except maybe NWSL).

    I am enjoying these games, but there are still a lot of issues that I want to see addressed, and that I don’t see anyone else talking about in a serious way. People talk about financial differences between teams, but never about a way to solve it. And for the most part, they still hold the minnow teams to the same high standards they expect of title contenders with far more resources. There are elements of cheating and bad sportsmanship creeping into the women’s game, but I think a lot of that could be remedied by the other systemic changes I have in mind. So without further ado, let’s get into what reforms I would implement if given the chance.

    A more equal method of player allocation

    This is the biggest change of all, and can be done in various ways. Within the current neoliberal system, probably the easiest way would be to implement a confederation (UEFA, AFC etc) wide team salary cap and / or individual player wage limit. The highest cap would apply to all top division leagues under the UEFA umbrella, and there would be lower caps for each division below the top, and be uniform across all countries as much as possible. Obviously depending on how many football league tiers each country has. Presumably it would be 3 or 4 in most cases, although I’m not sure on that.

    This would already make a massive difference to the competitiveness of leagues. You wouldn’t just have 3 or 4 title contenders and a bunch of no-hopers in the bottom half, just trying to lose the least games and not get relegated.

    However, I’d personally go a lot further. Similar to what the ACO does in Le Mans endurance racing, where they rank drivers gold, silver or bronze; and then stipulate that you can only have certain combinations of those ranks in your 3 driver teams per car, in order to ensure a competitive field. I’d like to see the same principle applied elsewhere.

    Every year, we see EA Sports rate every player in the leagues that are present in their game. Obviously, this wouldn’t be adequate for an official FIFA player rating, but you can see that it wouldn’t be that difficult to create such a system. presumably it would be significantly easier to achieve than what the IPC has to do for the Paralympics. Here, you’d only need to categorise players into a handful of ratings. As opposed to the huge variety of disabilities and severity of impairment in Para-sports. There probably would be a few controversies, but nothing serious. A player that falls on the wrong side of a gold or platinum rating would be highly sought after since they wouldn’t count towards a team’s top category allocation. So they would almost certainly end up at one of the most historically successful, most popular teams under the existing system.

    You can see that while the existing top teams would still have a competitive advantage as far as being able to get the first picks of top platinum and gold players, the inequality and competitiveness gap in leagues would close dramatically, to the point of relative parity. It would just be like getting picked in high school PE class where you’d have alternating picks. You end up with broadly comparable teams in the end.

    Ending in-season transfer windows

    One of the worst things about all team sports now is the frequency of player transfers. It really loses so much of the joy in supporting a team when you are constantly losing players. It’s no coincidence that the most popular players among any fan base are the ones who have been with that particular club for a decade.

    High player turnover may help your team win, but any victory will always be more hollow when it’s not with “your players” who have worked and improved for years until they win. Maybe you’ll have a couple of new additions each season under a new system, but no big scale revamps every offseason; and no in-season transfers.

    There’s nothing worse than in-season trades for player stress, fan disappointment and disillusionment. Of course injuries are a big thing in football, and you need to replace those players. However, teams should be forced to bring up academy players into the senior squad in these instances. It would encourage investment into academies. These players will also be rated though, so if top players are discovered, a team might have to give them up or make room on their rosters to account. Transfers would still have to happen, but they would be far less frequent, and far less traumatic for the players and teammates involved.

    Another aspect that I forgot to mention earlier in the equality of player distribution section is regarding large squads. Very often we see top teams filling their benches with quality players who could start for many other teams. This leads to intense frustration and talent being wasted. It also means that the top teams can avoid having to face these players. It’s a kind of power move so emblematic of this practically unregulated capitalist system. A change to a more egalitarian way of doing things will also alleviate this. Top players will always be playing and starting games. And decent players will always get good amounts of playing time off the bench at the very least.

    Slashing player salaries and introducing wage brackets

    This is a simple one. Male players in general are paid way too much, and I would even argue that the top female players are also paid way too much. I would cap both male and female pay at around £100,000 a year for platinum rated players. From what I’ve seen, there are women now making 8 times that. And Ronaldo in the men’s game something like 250 times that, which is beyond insane.

    From there, it would go down progressively for the different ranks, to something like £50k for the average first division player in any league. This is just a rough estimate, but you get the idea. There wouldn’t be a huge wage discrepancy from bottom to top.

    Ending corporate pay TV deals to get the money out

    The current system where many games are behind expensive paywalls for sports TV and streaming packages simply doesn’t serve the fans. Even if you pay for all of the services, you still are very limited in the number of games you can watch. If you’re a fan of a team, you should be able to watch every game. Either for free, or for a small and reasonable fee. Paying through the nose for a very limited service makes no sense. This is another thing the Americans get somewhat right (aside from rookie player drafts). If you’re a fan of a team, you can watch every game. It’s still far from perfect, but it’s better than what we have in the UK and many other countries.

    We need some combination or free-to-air TV, free streaming, affordable club or league specific streaming services or TV channels (with full access to all games if paid).

    Fan-owned teams

    This is an obvious one really. The fans are so crucial to football clubs. They’re such an integral part. They should collectively own the teams. It’s a model that works in Germany and elsewhere. It can easily be replicated. Get the capitalists out once and for all.

    Conclusion

    I think if we can achieve all or even just some of these things, the game (and other sports that are infected with capitalism) will be so much better. The focus needs to be back on fun and friendship, while still being competitive. At the moment, the money and high stakes (even in the women’s game now relatively speaking) encourages cheating, unsporting behaviour, and harder tackling which increases injury risk. And just generally it makes the sport much worse. The game as it exists now is far from “the beautiful game”. It’s an ugly, selfish, miserable game when you look beyond the glitz and glamour the slick media facade falsely presents. We need to take it back for the people.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started